Ihr Fall. Immer in der Tasche.
Status checken — beim Kaffee, im Stau, um 3 Uhr morgens. Ein Tab in Ihrem Handy. Alles drin.

We coordinate the expert, lawyer, and repair shop — and the partner law firm leads the negotiation with the opposing insurance. For you: €0 (§249 BGB). 32 days avg. payout instead of the industry average of 4–6 months.
Anonymous consultation · No commitment · GDPR-compliant
Aggregated analysis of all cases referred through the Claimondo partner network since inception. As of 14.05.2026. Detailed methodology available on request.
Real Google reviews
22 Google reviews
„Ich bin sehr positiv überrascht gewesen wie unkompliziert und schnell der Service durch Claimondo erfolgte. Als ich Opfer eines Parkremplers wurde wusste ich erstmal auch nicht was ich machen sollte um richtig vorzugehen. Zum Glück wurde mir Claimondo angezeigt, die mir schnell einen Gutachtertermin organisierten und mich in der Abwicklung von A bis Z unterstützten!"
V. R. · in der letzten Woche
„Unerwartet schnelle Bearbeitung. Besonders freundlicher Kontakt! Kann nur empfehlen!"
Lyubomir Bodurov · in der letzten Woche
„Schaden wurde gut betreut und vor allem wurde sich um Mietwagen und Kommunikation mit den Rechtsanwälten gekümmert. Kann ich nur empfehlen."
Jan · vor einer Woche
§249 BGB — Your statutory entitlement
Four damage positions — four conversations with the opposing insurance. Our partner law firm conducts them all. BGH-compliant.
Our partner law firm negotiates full reimbursement incl. UPE surcharges, transport, and adjacent-panel refinishing with the insurance. BGH VI ZR 65/18 + VI ZR 174/24.
Claim in detailOur partner law firm enforces diminished value claims using the Sanden/Danner formula — even when the insurance offers "adequate" compensation. BGH VI ZR 357/03.
Claim in detailOur partner law firm negotiates a rental car for the full repair period or a loss-of-use flat rate of €23–175/day based on the Sanden/Danner class.
Claim in detailThe partner law firm recovers expert and legal costs from the opposing liability insurer — §249 BGB. You pay €0.
Claim in detailWhen Things Get Difficult
Opposing insurers delay, send their own assessment services, or reduce payouts. Three typical situations — and what actually applies under BGH case law.
Default under §286 BGB, the 4-week settlement deadline, default interest, and leverage — when the opposing party is in default.
Rights in Case of Late PaymentYour independent expert is what counts — free choice of appraiser under §249 BGB. The opposing party's assessment services systematically reduce claims.
Free Choice of ExpertEight claims plus free choice of repair shop and expert (BGH VI ZR 53/09) — the complete overview for injured parties.
All Rights at a GlanceWhat happens in the first days after an accident determines the value of your claim. These seven mistakes cost money in practice most often — all avoidable with the right sequence of steps.
Why: "We'll take care of everything" means: claims steering to a partner workshop, no independent expert, no diminished value — typically 30–40% less in entitlements due to audit-service reductions (NDR investigative report 2022, Verbraucherzentrale, BGH VI ZR 38/22 ff.).
Better: Do not speak to the opposing insurance by phone. Report your claim with Claimondo — we handle all communication.
How to avoid this mistake →Mehr erfahrenWhy: "Who pays the piper calls the tune." — Insurance appraisers systematically underestimate damage. Examples: €2,000 instead of €9,000 after dismantling.
Better: You have a statutory right to an independent expert of your choice — at no cost if the accident was not your fault.
How to avoid this mistake →Mehr erfahrenWhy: Settlement declarations waive all future claims — including late-onset injuries or hidden vehicle defects.
Better: Never sign without a lawyer. If the accident was not your fault, the opposing party covers 100% of legal fees.
How to avoid this mistake →Mehr erfahrenWhy: Police officers are not automotive technicians. Hidden damage to chassis rails, control units, or the battery (EVs) goes undetected.
Better: Always commission an independent damage report — even for seemingly minor accidents.
How to avoid this mistake →Mehr erfahrenWhy: Without an expert report you forfeit diminished value (in year 2, approx. 20% of repair costs) and have no evidence in later disputes.
Better: Expert report first, then repair. Diminished value is your right regardless of whether you choose to repair.
How to avoid this mistake →Mehr erfahrenWhy: In a subsequent second accident at the same location, without proof of repair the insurer can refuse settlement entirely (HIS file).
Better: Two-photo rule: photograph the vehicle after repair with a dated newspaper in the frame. One wide shot and one close-up of the repaired area.
How to avoid this mistake →Mehr erfahrenWhy: Security cameras at petrol stations, car parks, and shops typically overwrite recordings after 3–4 weeks. Request too late and the evidence is gone.
Better: Request video footage within 48 hours. We coordinate the request through our partner law firm for traffic law where legal evidence preservation is required.
How to avoid this mistake →Mehr erfahrenSources: ADAC, Verbraucherzentrale, RA Günter Fenderl (specialist lawyer, traffic law), Bernd Hertfelder (publicly appointed and sworn automotive expert), Knowledge Base Initial Consultation May 2026
Special case: electric vehicles
DAT and Audatex often have no correct repair times on record for US vehicles. Real example: standard expert report €22,000 → with Tesla OEM data €48,000.
Rocker panel repairs on electric vehicles can destroy the control units beneath them months later. Any damage in the battery area requires a specialist expert — otherwise a hidden total loss is at risk.
Source: Bernd Hertfelder (publicly appointed automotive expert, HWK Stuttgart)

How it works
One contact coordinates the assessor, the repair shop and our partner law firm — you don't have to negotiate with anyone. Your damage is inspected on site by an independent expert, not by an insurer's online desk-check.
Service-Realität
Persönliche Begleitung, live verfolgbar, ohne Papierkram — so fühlt sich Schadensregulierung mit Claimondo an.
Status checken — beim Kaffee, im Stau, um 3 Uhr morgens. Ein Tab in Ihrem Handy. Alles drin.
Push: „Gutachter unterwegs." Push: „Anwalt hat geantwortet." Push: „Geld ist da." Sie checken nicht — wir benachrichtigen.
Ihren Ansprechpartner haben Sie mit Foto, Direktwahl und Sprechzeiten. Kein Call-Center-Roulette.
Wenn die Versicherung kürzt, sehen Sie es am selben Tag. Der Anwalt schreibt zurück, bevor Sie „Wartezeit" tippen können.
Null Papier. Für uns nicht, für Sie nicht. Was anderswo ein Briefumschlag ist, ist bei uns ein Tap.
Branchen-Durchschnitt: 4–6 Monate. Bei uns: 32 Tage. Weil disponiert statt vermittelt — und alles digital.
Warum wir schneller sind
Hinter unseren 32 Tagen steckt eine Plattform-Mechanik, die Gutachter, Anwalt und Versicherung in einem Workflow zusammenführt.
Nächster freier Gutachter — nicht der, der in drei Wochen Zeit hat. Wie Uber, aber für Schadensgutachten.
Sachverständiger hat alle Daten mobile, sieht alles live, kann sofort zurückpingen. Kein Papierkram, keine Aktenlieferung.
Wenn die Versicherung kürzen will, schreibt unser Anwalt zurück — bevor Sie „Wartezeit" tippen können.
Payment in 32 Days
3 fields, no registration — done in 60 seconds.
View detailsNext available appraiser — not the one free in three weeks. On-site in under 48 h.
View detailsPartner law firm for traffic law handles all correspondence. Workshop operates on BGH-compliant rates.
View details4-week deadline under §286 BGB. If they attempt a reduction: our lawyer responds the same day.
View detailsØ 32 days from claim submission to payout. Trackable live in the portal.
View detailsOn site, not at a desk
Insurers route claims to online desk-check services that value your car without ever seeing it. An independent expert on site spots what they make disappear.
How we assess
Independent expert — on site
How the insurer "checks"
The insurer's online desk-check
Typical reduction by insurer desk-check services: 30–40 % (NDR report 2022, consumer association, German Federal Court VI ZR 38/22 ff.).
Der BGH stützt Sie
Höchstrichterliche Rechtsprechung von 1992 bis 2025 — Werkstattrisiko, UPE, Beilackierung, Wertminderung und 130%-Regel sind seit Jahren BGH-fest. Versicherer kürzen trotzdem. Wir holen es zurück.
5 Leitentscheidungen 16.01.2024: Werkstattrisiko trägt die Versicherung.
Im Cluster ansehen →BGH VI ZR 65/18UPE-Aufschläge auch bei fiktiver Abrechnung erstattungsfähig.
Im Cluster ansehen →BGH VI ZR 174/24Beilackierungskosten sind erstattungsfähiger Teil des Schadens.
Im Cluster ansehen →BGH VI ZR 53/09Unter 3 Jahren oder Scheckheft → Stundenverrechnung Markenwerkstatt.
Im Cluster ansehen →BGH VI ZR 119/04Restwertbörsen überregional irrelevant — regionaler Markt zählt.
Im Cluster ansehen →BGH VI ZR 357/03Merkantile Wertminderung auch bei älteren Fahrzeugen.
Im Cluster ansehen →Reparatur bis 130 % des Wiederbeschaffungswertes zulässig.
Auch überhöhte SV-Honorare gehen zu Lasten der Versicherung.
Im Cluster ansehen →Quelle: juris.bundesgerichtshof.de — Volltexte über Aktenzeichen abrufbar
What many people give away
Even after a perfect repair, the market value of an accident-damaged vehicle falls. The opposing insurance pays this merkantile Wertminderung — typically between €500 and €2,500. Repair shop estimates never calculate it.
Worked example
VW Golf, 2 years old, repair costs €6,000
Rule-of-thumb diminished value: 1,200 € (20 % of repair costs)
Basis: Sanden/Danner formula · BGH VI ZR 357/03 rejects a fixed age threshold.
| Vehicle age | Diminished value (% of repair costs) | Example at €6,000 damage |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | 25 % | 1,500 € |
| Year 2 | 20 % | 1,200 € |
| Year 3 | 15 % | 900 € |
| Year 4 | 10 % | 600 € |
| Year 5+ | Case-by-case assessment | depends on model & mileage |
Rule-of-thumb figures per Sanden/Danner. Exact amount is determined in the expert report — depending on market value, mileage, and extent of damage.
Insurers route claims to review services such as ControlExpert, K-Expert and DEKRA — who artificially reduce figures without inspecting the vehicle. Insurer review services typically cut 30–40 % of claims (NDR documentary 2022, Verbraucherzentrale, BGH VI ZR 38/22 ff.). With Claimondo, you keep what you are owed.
| Trigger / Claim | Party / Review service | Reduction mechanism | Counter-argument |
|---|---|---|---|
"We take care of everything" §249 BGB | HUK · LVM · Allianz ControlExpert | Claim steering to partner workshop → no diminished value, no independent expert | You are entitled to your own repair shop + an independent expert.What holds up under BGH scrutiny |
"An expert report is not necessary" BGH VI ZR 357/03 | HUK · AXA ControlExpert · K-Expert | Estimate instead of expert report → diminished value disappears, 30–40% less claim | Only an expert calculates diminished value. For damage > €750 the report is free of charge.What holds up under BGH scrutiny |
Reduction via audit report BGH VI ZR 65/18 · VI ZR 174/24 | all major ControlExpert · K-Expert · DEKRA | UPE surcharges, transport, blending, labour rates cut — without inspection | BGH-proof: UPE + blending are reimbursable. A lawyer writes back.What holds up under BGH scrutiny |
"Residual value higher at other providers" BGH VI ZR 119/04 | all major supra-regional online residual-value exchange | Residual value artificially inflated → payout suppressed by up to €3,000 | Residual value = regional market. You are not obliged to accept the insurer's offer.What holds up under BGH scrutiny |
"Repair shop charges too much" BGH VI ZR 38/22 ff. (2024) | HUK · LVM ControlExpert | Leaving unreimbursed repair-shop costs with the injured party | The repair-shop risk is borne by the insurance — not by you.What holds up under BGH scrutiny |
"Expert report is unusable" BGH VI ZR 280/22 | HUK · LVM in-house claims department | Complete refusal of expert costs + replacement value | The insurance bears the expert risk. Lawyer files suit at the competent regional court.What holds up under BGH scrutiny |
Sources: NDR documentary Prüfdienstleister, initial consultation knowledge base May 2026, juris.bundesgerichtshof.de

Your case in the app
Every step, every payout, every deadline: see your case status anytime in the app — and reach your advisor with one tap.



Who looks after you
From the first call to the payout, real people are there for you — one dedicated contact coordinates the assessor, the repair shop and our partner law firm. No hold queue, no changing case handler.
Who is behind Claimondo
We know what it's like to face an insurance company after an accident. That's exactly why we founded Claimondo.

Managing Director, CEO & Co-Founder
Nicolas leads Claimondo and is the point of contact for insurance partnerships and strategic law firm collaborations. His drive: making claim settlement in Germany transparent and on equal terms — no insurer boilerplate, no reduction tactics.
"It's not about who I am, but what I do. That's how one is measured." — Batman
Managing Director, COO & Co-Founder
Aaron oversees Operations, Product, and the tech platform at Claimondo. With a background in sales and account management at nextright and AdvoScale, he knows exactly where the leverage lies between customer promise and actual payout. Aaron is the interface between expert appraisers, lawyers, and our software.
"Quality means doing it right when no one is watching." — Henry Ford

Personal guidance
You have one dedicated contact: we coordinate the assessor, the repair shop and our partner law firm, keep an eye on every deadline and keep you posted — you never have to chase anyone.
— Claimondo claim support
DAT expert network
Move the map or open the full search — independent experts in your region. Focus on NRW, connected nationwide.
Claims Report 2026
Audit services such as ControlExpert and K-Expert typically cut 30–40% of claims — UPE surcharges, transport costs, adjacent-panel blending, diminished value. Our report maps the most common reduction items to the BGH rulings that override them.
View reportFrequently asked questions
In a no-fault accident with damage exceeding 750 €, you pay 0 €. The opposing liability insurer covers all costs under §249 BGB. Fees based on the BVSK-Honorartabelle range from 550 € to 2,600 € depending on the extent of damage.
Certified partner appraisers from the Claimondo network inspect your vehicle nationwide in under 48 hours — usually the same or the following business day.
Insurers such as HUK, LVM, and AXA typically reduce UPE surcharges, transport costs, and Wertminderung (diminished value) via audit service providers (ControlExpert, K-Expert, DEKRA). However, the BGH supports injured parties in its leading decisions VI ZR 65/18, VI ZR 174/24, and VI ZR 38/22 ff. Our partner law firm for traffic law recovers all reductions in full — including through litigation.
Yes. With partial fault, the opposing insurance covers the proportional share. In a 50:50 split, your own comprehensive insurance (Kasko) pays the preferential positions (repair, diminished value, expert fees, towing costs) up to 100 % via the Quotenvorrecht.
No. Do not speak directly with the opposing insurance — they will send their own appraiser (ControlExpert, K-Expert), who systematically reduces claims. Insurer review services typically cut 30–40 % of claims (source: NDR documentary "Prüfdienstleister" 2022, Verbraucherzentrale analyses, BGH landmark rulings VI ZR 38/22 ff. / VI ZR 65/18 / VI ZR 174/24). With an independent certified expert, all BGH-compliant positions are properly documented.
The merkantile Wertminderung (diminished market value) calculated using the Sanden/Danner formula ranges between €500 and €2,500. Rule of thumb: year 1: 25 %, year 2: 20 %, year 3: 15 %, year 4: 10 % of repair costs. No fixed age limit according to BGH VI ZR 357/03.
The 130 % rule (BGH VI ZR 67/91) permits repair costs up to 130 % of the replacement value — provided repairs are carried out professionally in accordance with the expert report and the vehicle continues to be used for 6 months.
On 16.01.2024, the BGH clarified in five landmark decisions (VI ZR 38/22, 239/22, 253/22, 266/22, 51/23): injured parties are not required to verify repair invoices themselves. Workshop charges too high or work not carried out → the opposing insurance bears the risk.
The HIS file (Hinweis- und Informationssystem — central claims register) stores every reported accident centrally, accessible to all insurers. Anyone who settles on a notional basis and later reports new damage to the same area risks full denial of the claim — recommended evidence preservation: two-photo rule with a current dated newspaper.
Not entirely. In Tesla and other electric vehicles, control units are located beneath sill covers — consequential damage often only emerges months later. DAT/Audatex frequently lack correct assembly times for US vehicles: a standard estimate of €22,000 can turn out to be €48,000 using Tesla original data. We connect you with specialist EV appraisers.
Call us, send a WhatsApp message, or report your claim online.